avhception a day ago

When I read "PDNS", I will probably always think "PowerDNS".

  • feldrim a day ago

    Yes. That's why I put the footnote there.

    • avhception 21 hours ago

      Well, I read that footnote, but I'm not sure if overloading the acronym is the best idea, is what I'm trying to say.

      • feldrim 20 hours ago

        I agree with you there. But the term does not belong to me buy yo CISA and other organisations. But it's not as bad as Cyber Security Awareness Month acronym at least

mfro 9 hours ago

I love Technitium DNS and have run it for several years now. Thanks for the contributions.

Milpotel a day ago

Don't get too exited - Technitium has a bus factor of one, a very small user base and no previous auditing.

  • johnea 10 hours ago

    Yea, I often wonder when I see this type of article, why don't they just use bind9?

    No other DNS resolver is going to come close to it's number of deployment*years in operation.

    I didn't read the article though, since I'm not going to enable javasript and cookies just to read someone's blag post 8-/

    HTML much?

    • feldrim 9 hours ago

      The only problem there is for GDPR consent thingy. You can disable and proceed. I don't use any telemetry except for the consent banners.

      When it comes to Technitium, well, it's written in the blog.

  • esseph a day ago

    And yet here I am deploying it in production

    • Milpotel 19 hours ago

      You are a brave fellow!

      • esseph 3 hours ago

        Not so much, just old enough to do proper risk analysis and have safeguards in place.

feldrim a day ago

I've played with threat intelligence to build a simple, on premises PDNS out of a privacy-focused DNS server.